Again, coming at this from the perspective of competition law—which is where I come at it from—I think what the tribunal did was a careful assessment. This was not a sweetheart deal by Rogers in order to protect itself from future competition. The tribunal took the commissioner's argument seriously that Videotron would potentially not be as vigorous a competitor. It analyzed that carefully and came to the conclusion that Videotron has a history of success and there's no reason to think its success would not continue post acquisition.
From a competition law perspective, I think the tribunal discharged its duty exactly in answering those questions about the vigorous competition remaining.