In a broad sense, that's a pretty wide range of activities. That is inclusive of a lot of the activities that independent repairers need.
However, it's foreseeable that there are future uses of TPMs that impair other public-interest uses of technologies that the law should be able to respond to. It should be able to have a proactive approach, essentially.
This is where my suggestion that we move in a more regulatory direction comes from. It's not a concession from a right to repair perspective. It's actually a way of thinking more broadly about the issue and responding to the uses of TPMs that undermine the public interest.