Under Bill C-244, circumvention of technological protection measures will be allowed only “for the purpose of the diagnosis, maintenance or repair of a product”, as we've stated.
You touched on this a bit, Mr. Rosborough. How would this limitation be enforced in practice? Can you reiterate a couple of those points for me?
Also, could persons or companies that engage in the manufacture, importation, distribution, sale, renting and provision of technologies, devices or components to circumvent TPMs be held liable where these products are used for other purposes?