I would defer to Mr. Rosborough on the classes issue. However, I would like to say that I would not be in favour of a sort of triennial review process, like what is happening in the United States. What we've seen there is that it's overly burdensome and that a tremendous amount of resources and attention and lobbying power and money goes into producing arguments every three years. The provisions, whatever might be produced in this three-year cycle, have to be readdressed in the next three years, so they don't necessarily carry over.
My preference would be to send a very clear statement, which I think this bill does, so there is certainty both for consumers and for manufacturers about the state of things, with the understanding that this can be revisited as the need arises in the future.