When the CRTC actually launches these hearing processes, that's where there is an opportunity to be flexible as well. There's lots of latitude in this. It is a discovery process to figure out how Internet service providers are going to display or transmit their services for Canadians.
This is what this bill does that's different. Again, it's back to the policy directive path. The other thing is that it's a very transparent process as well. The directive policy did come from government. It came from cabinet. It's a few people in a back room saying, “Here—this is a good idea. Look at this.” Then they have a headline. This is legislation. As the House of Commons, we are all accountable for this.
Personally, I've heard very positive feedback from smaller Internet service providers, interestingly enough. I've had more positive feedback from them because it takes that noise away. I've called it false advertising. They can be very transparent and certain about what service they, as the smallest Internet service provider, are offering, which might be lots, especially in rural and sparsely populated areas. It does actually level the playing field for not only the consumer but the industry as well.