In some ways, what we're talking about here is a little bit of comparing apples to oranges. In the one case, it's circumventing the TPM in a physical device for the purpose of making it interoperable with another device or computer program. In some ways, that's quite distinct from circumventing a TPM that protects an algorithmic process to understand how it works for other purposes. In some ways, it's kind of apples to oranges.
You could say, on the question of AI, that there may be some positive social role for TPMs in ensuring that AI systems are not tampered with in a way that produces social harms. However, I think that's a very separate issue from the one we're dealing with today, which is really concerned with secondary markets, competition and innovation. I think that's the pure purpose and spirit of this bill, and I think that's the context in which it should be analyzed.