Thank you.
My first question is for Ms. Stanley.
Discussions of interoperability in Canadian copyright law often reference the Federal Court case of Nintendo of America v. King as one of the only cases in which a Canadian court has considered the technological protection measures circumvention provisions of the Copyright Act.
What did the court say in this decision? How has the court's interpretation of the Copyright Act's technological protection measures circumvention provisions affected their application as it relates to interoperability?