On the question of the fraud calls, I want to correct you on that. One of the problems with the implementation of all of those anti-fraud systems is the false positives they create. It's true that they can stop certain fraudulent calls, but one has to be very careful about not blocking legitimate communications. That is a technical issue. The technology wasn't ready, and the telcos weren't ready for it.
Besides that, on the question of the new policy direction that we see with very good words about consumers and competition, it's important to recognize that this is the second policy direction this government has issued. The first one actually did the exact opposite. It was essentially trying to roll back a lot of the progress that had been made in trying to create a more competitive environment with the CRTC regulations between 2012 and 2016. The government essentially issued a policy direction that forced the regulator to reverse course. It's now reversing course again. That is a key problem with giving policy directions to an independent regulator. You are creating this dynamic inconsistency in a policy.
In my view, the act that Parliament has set out is very clear about its objectives in promoting affordability, quality of service, and universal access. The problem with this policy direction is that it essentially tries to.... At one point, the industry puts a lot of pressure on the government, and the government gives direction to the CRTC to not do too much. You have to be very careful not to get away from the legislative framework you have set out already. That's the key, I think.