I have a follow-up to Mr. Patzer's statement.
If I'm doing my layman's interpretation of what he said, proposed paragraph 41.12(1)(a) is intended to be the broader application, and (b) is meant for a specific purpose. If (b) goes in, do we just end up with two broad statements that are doing the same thing, as opposed to the specific example Mr. Patzer wanted in the bill in (b), with (a) being the one that gives the power that you were speaking to?