I will say that, yes, it's a new ministerial authority, because technically that's what it is.
The national security process is divided into a series of stages. In the early stages, when there is a reasonable suggestion that something could be injurious to national security, the minister has the ability to act and notify them. At the next stage, similarly, after both the Minister of Public Safety and the Minister of Industry together have determined that they believe that this could be injurious to national security, he can proceed. The stage after that, however, requires us to go to an OIC to cabinet. There's an important role for OIC at cabinet. That's why, at the very final stage, we would leave in place cabinet's ability to review before any block or any divestiture happens.
In terms of that previous stage, frankly, the value of cabinet's discussion at that point is less important than it is at the end. To the minister's point, it slows down the process and it makes it more difficult for the security intelligence community to have the time they need to do that.
This is the place in the process where we found an efficiency. We believe that we can move that while still getting all the benefits and ensuring that we have full cabinet vision and transparency.