Definitely. I think, in fact, that this is something we anticipated. What I want for the country is for the bill to provide even more tools.
For example, it would no longer be the Governor in Council, but rather the minister, who could extend review periods. This would give intelligence services more time to do their work. And then there is the exchange of information. That was a concern shared by several of our opposition colleagues who were in government. We want to give the security organizations more time to do their work.
Then there's the whole issue of undertakings that have to be submitted in compliance with the bill. This, for cases of national security, would enable us to have legally binding undertakings.
This set of tools will enable us to better defend Canada's national security in terms of investment.
Going back to the question asked previously by one of our colleagues, Canada attracted a record number of investments in recent years, and that's a good thing. Nevertheless, these investments have to benefit Canadians. I believe we were able to do that during these years, but the bill will certainly be useful to future ministers, becausethey will have more tools in the tool box.