I'm pretty sure you've had time to make this your bedtime reading over the last few days.
Last year, when Bill C‑10 was being studied, a particular clause was removed. That created quite a controversy afterwards, which probably contributed to the failure of this bill. This is clause 4.1, which was reinstated in Bill C‑11.
I'd like to hear your comments on how the clause was worded in the current version of the bill.