I think in terms of having at least a framework for intervention in an investment that may raise the concerns that we're talking about, that's good. The question is how you actually then wind up elaborating that regime and providing guidance to the civil servants who will ultimately be administering it.
If it's just like a set of check boxes that you tick and see whether or not this fits into the category and that then is kicked over into a process for an interim review where there's another set of boxes to tick as to whether or not something happens, then the real question is, what are the labels on those boxes? How do we actually implement such a regime? Do we have a framework for classifying data concerns that would then allow the minister to intervene in a way that we've been talking about on transparency, as Daniel Schwanen has been emphasizing?
We need to have a framework that gives the minister a leg to stand on when making such interventions. I don't think that we've elaborated that framework at all so far in Canada.