Evidence of meeting #70 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was foreign.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Charles Burton  Senior Fellow, Centre for Advancing Canada's Interests Abroad, Macdonald-Laurier Institute, As an Individual
Daniel Schwanen  Vice-President, Research, C.D. Howe Institute
Dan Ciuriak  Senior Fellow, Centre for International Governance Innovation
Jim Balsillie  Chair, Council of Canadian Innovators
Sandy Walker  Chair, Competition Law and Foreign Investment Review Section, The Canadian Bar Association
Michael Caldecott  Chair, Foreign Investment Review Committee, Competition Law and Foreign Investment Review Section, The Canadian Bar Association

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

—and that's an issue. In the world we live in today, with the assets being tangible and intangible, that's an area. Because ministers have not used the powers they have in the past, do you not think we need to be more prescriptive in the act of what absolutely has to go through, since the government hasn't always used the tools at its disposal?

5:25 p.m.

Chair, Council of Canadian Innovators

Jim Balsillie

Well, there's a place for prescription, but also when you pull it out into an expert agency, you tend to get somebody who's quite accountable to that and takes it through a very specific lens.

It's very difficult when you're a minister who's trying to juggle many things and trying to promote things, but also to regulate. It's a difficult place to put yourself in. I would argue, don't put—

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

They have all these departments on it—a lot more than we do in the opposition—to go through these things.

Recommendation 8 of the industry committee report from the last Parliament said the other area that we should look at—that isn't included in the act now—is when a Canadian company or asset is acquired by a foreign entity that's not hostile to Canada, and then that company is ultimately bought by a hostile player. Lots of jurisdictions have the ability to go back and look at that asset and demand that it be devolved as part of that acquisition.

What are your views on that?

I'd like to hear from Dr. Burton as well, but let's start with Mr. Balsillie.

5:25 p.m.

Chair, Council of Canadian Innovators

Jim Balsillie

Yes, of course, if the deal changes the circumstances of the original one, we have to have a lens to look after ourselves in a difficult world.

5:25 p.m.

Senior Fellow, Centre for Advancing Canada's Interests Abroad, Macdonald-Laurier Institute, As an Individual

Dr. Charles Burton

I absolutely agree with Mr. Balsillie on this point.

I think that is part of the Chinese strategy, to evade our regulations, to come in through different kinds of maybe sneaky means to get in there. I think there are lots of examples of this kind of thing, particularly in third world nations.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Could you share with us some of the other jurisdictions? Also, in your opening remarks you referred to some examples that we should be considering. Could you actually table those examples with the committee?

5:30 p.m.

Senior Fellow, Centre for Advancing Canada's Interests Abroad, Macdonald-Laurier Institute, As an Individual

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Thank you.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Joël Lightbound

Thank you very much, Mr. Perkins.

That concludes the two hours we have for this meeting.

Thank you to all of our witnesses today for sharing their perspectives. It's much appreciated.

I'd also like to thank the interpreters, support staff, analysts and clerks. Lastly, I'd like to thank you, esteemed colleagues.

This meeting is adjourned.