I will go back to Mr. Leblond.
You mentioned Rona not being strategic, but when you look at some of the consumer stuff out there, as an economist.... I'm just looking at lack of competition being a big issue. Zellers was bought by Target, and Zellers was making a profit. It actually had benefits for its workers and so forth. Target is now gone. Future Shop was bought by Best Buy, and it closed up. Stone Canyon in Windsor bought Windsor Salt. They also bought an American firm, and now there are strikes and stuff like that.
With Rona and Lowe's, I guess I would argue that, for a strategic industry, these are consumer products that have intrinsic values in our economy for businesses and consumers. How do we relate that?
I'm not taking offence to your comment and saying it's not strategic. I want to challenge that assessment in the sense that the lack of competition by losing consumer products that are connected to small and medium-sized businesses becomes a problematic thing for our economy.