In a way, I'm using the terms that are set in the bill. Obviously, “intellectual property” covers a lot of ground.
Ultimately, what matters is that.... Again, if we're talking about national security, it should involve the investment review people, but they should certainly talk to the people at CSIS. Maybe they should talk to the people at Global Affairs Canada, who might have certain knowledge about a company or where it comes from and about the investors themselves.
Where is that expertise, whether it's in terms of the technology or the person acquiring it?
To me, it should be much more of a whole-of-government approach, since national security is a whole-of-government issue, even on the net benefit, which, to me, is separate from the national security one. More and more it seems that, as I just mentioned, co-operating with the Competition Bureau would be a good idea.