Let me ask the question, and then maybe you can build it into where we're going, because it's sort of linked.
We've had a chat about the speed. A primary purpose of this bill is to make the process quicker. I've sat around C-suites for 25 years as a business guy. I know that I made brilliant decisions in the things I was responsible for, but I always had to bring them to the executive table for a discussion. Generally—as you know as a business professor—you get better decisions out of the team's scrutinizing that then you do out of one particular individual making the choice on their own.
By the same token, what the current Investment Canada Act requires is that when the review, either on net benefit or national security, is done, the minister has to go to the Governor in Council, to the cabinet, with a recommendation and get their judgment. I've talked to a number of former ministers about those discussions that have happened on this, and they said that they got better decisions because they had a multitude of perspectives at the table. I'm a little concerned about removing...which this bill does. It removes that part of it and leaves it solely to the minister.
Like any executive and like any minister, some are better than others, and if you leave it solely to the minister, you lose the importance of that corporate executive decision-making process.