I would suggest that would apply to net benefits as well, because in some cases, that could be not just a security issue; it could be a net benefit issue for Canada.
On your second point, on non-compliance, I agree with you on the fine issue because it doesn't appear to me that the minister has the authority to force a company to divest if they don't meet conditions.
I'll give you an example. Nexen, one of our important oil sands players, was bought by CNOOC, 10 years ago. A number of conditions were put on it by the government of the day—the Harper government. Those conditions were up, and my understanding is that many haven't been met, but it doesn't look to me like the act gives the minister the power to actually say, “You haven't met the conditions. Therefore”—in the most extreme—“you have to divest yourself of that asset because you didn't meet the conditions.”
Is that the idea of what you were looking at?