I want to get into the other thing you were talking about earlier, which was the critical technology list that CFIUS has. Maybe I'll ask this of some of the other witnesses here.
In Canada, we seem to have an investment review division that's part of ISED. What CFIUS says is that it's multi-agency. I think Mr. Masse mentioned about 15 different agencies. They're on their own.
I agree that we shouldn't have a list that's embedded or baked into legislation, because it can take 15 years sometimes to undo that, but is the investment review division sufficient? To any of the witnesses, instead of being baked into just ISED, should it be across many agencies?
I'll start with Mr. Leblond.