I think it is absolutely the case that we want the ability to revise that list frequently. I think the only counter-argument to it is that if you revise it too frequently, it reduces certainty for investors. I'm sure it's one reason that, for the CFIUS process and the U.K. process, they review on a multi-year basis, as opposed to every year. I agree that there is a balance.
The other part of this is that our process under the Investment Canada Act is only one way for the federal government to be aware of emerging trends and things of concern, so we also have the benefit of that part of it to help tell us that these sectors are emerging and that we may need to protect or watch for developments in them, including in foreign investment.