That's a very good question.
When we refer to the situation we have now, we have to cut ourselves a bit of slack. I think the reason the government wanted those technologies and areas to be taken broadly was that we had to look at all of the potential relevance of that to determine whether there was a national security issue.
The problem is that once you put in a system that requires investors to do something in advance, with the risk of sanctions if they fail to comply, you have to spell it out a bit more clearly so that they know what they're responding to, where they might have an issue and where they might need to engage the government. Although I take the point that spelling it out in detail may exclude things, I think, on balance, if you're mandating people to come in before and engage with the government, you have to have that clarity so they know what to do.