Yes, this is where I think striking the balance is of the essence. As I said earlier, if the legal framework is too rigid, then you are stuck with some stuff that is difficult to change. On the other hand, if you go with only some directives that can be changed by ministers and their successors, that sends funny signals in the market. You need to find the balance.
This is also why I checked with a lot of attention what the Canadian Bar Association said—that, when it comes to defining what the sectors are, what you want to regulate and why you want to do it, you have to send the appropriate signal and have the appropriate debate. If you want to go with regulations, you can have a larger discussion. If you concentrate everything in the hands of the minister, you will create some uncertainty.