I suppose that expanding CFIUS's jurisdiction would cause more transactions to come under its review.
I guess I'm not exactly sure what the question is. Is the question what view CFIUS has if it doesn't cover these kinds of greenfield transactions?
I suppose on the Hill there are a lot of discussions related to China-specific restrictions. For example, there are a few acts in Congress. There are acts in the state legislatures that would further restrict Chinese investment into real estate or critical minerals, so we may see some of them moving forward.
From what I've seen, the concern is more a domestic concern about control of those supply chains or critical minerals, from what I've heard in talking to counterparts. I spent several years doing an international engagement function for CFIUS, and this wasn't something I was hearing. I was hearing mostly domestic concern about whether there need to be more restrictions or review rather than concern about foreign partners.