CFIUS's jurisdiction is primarily over investments into U.S. businesses that are already functioning. CFIUS also has jurisdiction over certain real estate greenfield transactions around identified military facilities. This particular transaction was a greenfield transaction not near one of those identified facilities, although I'll note that since this finding of not having jurisdiction, CFIUS has updated its list to cover it.
I think what you're pointing out here is that in the U.S. greenfield businesses are not generally covered for CFIUS review, whereas I believe they are in Canada. What we're seeing in the U.S. are some proposals to expand CFIUS's jurisdiction, but we're not seeing anything moving in the short term. As noted, CFIUS has regulatory authority to update certain of its definitions, and it has expanded the number of military sites around which real estate is covered.