This is my last point on this. When it comes to CFIUS versus the investment review division, the investment review division has public input while CFIUS seems to be less transparent. We did have a part of this bill that talked about some parts of the ICA being able to be non-transparent and secretive, with secret evidence and secret judges.
Are there parts of this where you feel CFIUS warrants having a little less transparency, or do you believe that we should find more transparency, as we seem to do with the investment review division?