Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have a couple of follow-up questions from the last round.
A comment to start is that it seems that the positive obligation on behalf of corporations and the individuals running those corporations is where we're going to see, as I see it, the most vulnerability in this legislation. What comes to mind as well, in the context of positive obligation and putting all of that on individuals or corporations, is that corporations, under the bill, are only liable for a summary conviction with a fine not exceeding $5,000.
Why is there the discrepancy between the $200,000 fine for an individual, but an individual working under a corporation is only subject to $5,000?