I would say that it's a matter of balance. When we look at the European Court of Justice's decision, we don't want to fall into that. To your point, I think Canadians want us to try to strike the right balance so that, on one hand, if you're a bad actor, law enforcement will get access to all of that, and we'll find you. However, in terms of public disclosure, we thought that the balance to make sure that we don't have a challenge under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was the right balance to strike. Therefore, the information is available to law enforcement, but what we made public is the address and the name of the individual of significant control.
On June 5th, 2023. See this statement in context.