I think that again I'm going to make the important distinction between the fines that are levied against the corporation versus the fines that are actually attributable to the individual directors and officers of the corporation. The $5,000 is consistent with all of the other penalties levelled against the corporation in the act. It's the consistent fine that we level against corporations for misconduct under the act. Again, we feel that the ability to render penalties against the corporation is a limited mechanism by which to actually root out the behaviour because it isn't tied to the individuals.
The $200,000 is an individual liability, so again you can't tie it to revenue, because they're not corporations; they're individuals. When you imagine being a director or an officer of a corporation and potentially being liable for $200,000 of your own money and six months in jail of your own time, it actually takes on quite a meaningful potential incentive to ensure that your corporation is actually on the right side of the law.