I just want to make sure that.... One thing I articulated was understood, which was not that the subjectivity itself was potentially a cause for concern in terms of the value or the sentiment it expresses.
What I was expressing was that the current definition—“an entity that is controlled or influenced, directly or indirectly, by a government or agency referred to in paragraph (a)”, which goes back to the definition—is sufficiently broad for the contemplation of the act, and the provisions in question are to define what an SOE is for the purposes of the contemplation of the act. It actually has no bearing, then, on the potential actions that must be taken in those cases, other than the fact that they're understood as one.
This definition, and what I was trying to underscore, is actually very broad, and it allows us to be able to contemplate all of those of comportments and behaviours, and that's why we felt comfortable with the fact that this definition is quite broad.