With regard to thresholds, you wrote in your letter to the committee that you support the spirit of some of the discussions we've had around this table on lowering the threshold to 10% for significant ownership or, as another option, adopting more stringent language, as found in the U.K. registry, to ensure that stacked corporations, or the problem that Mr. Van Bynen and I raised regarding stacked corporations, could be addressed accordingly.
Maybe I'll pose this question to the RCMP.
Would lowering the threshold to 10% create any unnecessary administrative complications between the terrorism financing and money-laundering act and this registry? Could we work it out so that law enforcement agencies have the right information if the threshold under this legislation is different from, say, the threshold for significant ownership in the other legislation?