The obligation on the registry is to provide the natural person at the very end of the chain. It is not to provide the corporation that has individuals who have significant control. It's the natural person who controls that. Otherwise, you could end up in this endless loop, where corporation one is owned by two, which is owned by three, which is owned by four and by five.
What our law asks for is this: Who is the human, the natural person, at the very end of the chain who is actually exercising control? If that person is exercising greater than 25% of control, that's whose name appears in the individuals of significant control registry.