Thank you so much for your question.
I just want to comment that small and medium-sized enterprises can use a publicly accessible beneficial ownership registry to carry out supplier due diligence. If one business is about to transact with another business, they can use the registry to understand who might be the beneficial owners of that contractor, for instance, as part of their due diligence perspective.
In the United States, they took a very different approach for a variety of reasons. When we spoke with our colleagues in the United States, who have driven a public beneficial ownership registry campaign on behalf of civil society, they commented that campaign financing, for instance, was the biggest barrier preventing the United States from making their own beneficial ownership registry publicly accessible.
Did I answer that question clearly?