With respect, Mr. Chair, I would disagree. Privacy rights, particularly as they're spelled out here, actually speak to legislative and statutory obligations that exist under the Personal Information Protection and Electronics Documents Act. Where it speaks to intellectual property rights, those are actually spelled out in the Patent Act, in the Trademarks Act and in the Industrial Design Act.
The degree to which this specifies rights that are specific but doesn't actually list all of the other acts we care about, which also come into play and should be respected, runs the risk, actually, of having the contention that the government didn't think about them and therefore they're out of bounds.
With respect to the contention that we need to care about these, I would very much contend that the broad capacity of the ICA to look at factors related to investment in Canada includes intangible assets and privacy considerations. In fact, I know of a very specific case in which intangible assets and intellectual property rights were specific to the considerations that were given under the ICA.