I'll just follow up on Mr. Généreux's question, if I could.
Mr. Schaan, I get that it does remove that, so I agree that it's narrowing the process. It's doing the intent, which is to do a deeper dive into these issues for the minister. However, it doesn't change the ultimate decision-making process that the minister has from the results of the reviews by those agencies. The minister still has to review those. It doesn't restrict their ability, from my understanding. Once the recommendations come back from those reviews, the minister still has decision-making power. It hasn't changed what to do with that information and whether or not the minister believes that there is a net benefit issue or a national security issue and then makes the decision whether or not to go to cabinet with that.
It doesn't remove his or her discretion on that, I believe. Is that correct? It forces a process, but it doesn't predetermine the result.