Thank you.
I think you have some of those processes in the investment review division, which is where you operate.
There have been other instances, where the minister, for instance, has banned Huawei from Canada. There are universities still working with Huawei right now. There are, again, intangible assets. Of our applied research funding, 95% goes to our institutions and we still have that threat in those institutions, taking that IP away from Canada. Again, we're not addressing it per se in this act. When we have one amendment, how are we then addressing it in other acts? I think that's really important.
We've had a lot of witnesses talk about the supply chain. The current IRD is not going to shape or dictate the value chain in Canada, or supply chains. One of the biggest issues we had a lot of testimony about was critical minerals. When we look at some of this foreign direct investment and some of the tangible assets, the IRD would certainly look at everything through an Investment Canada Act range. However, when it comes to supply chains, is there anything outside of this amendment, outside of this act, that will allow the IRD to look at supply chains as a whole? Could you maybe answer that with any knowledge you have on the supply chain strategy that Canada has right now?