It's mandating the imposition or deletion of interim conditions, essentially. There are examples—for instance, on national security cases—where interim conditions may not be appropriate.
For instance, if it's a transaction involving the purchase of a business with a location that is sensitive due to its proximity to a sensitive site, if that transaction hasn't closed, there would be no appropriate interim conditions. The only thing that's appropriate in that review would essentially be the final conditions.
There would be a national security risk during the review if we were to have interim conditions disclosed, until the determination has actually been made. This essentially would ensure that there's a consideration of national security risk about the interim conditions.