We'll go back to the same discussion we had last week about whether or not things are for greater certainty or whether they're actually narrow.
If there was an indication that this was for greater certainty, it would not negate what precedes...as in, already calling on allowing for it. By explicitly calling for just these two factors, it draws attention to these two factors and suggests that potentially they were intentional and that no others are.
As noted, our national security guidelines already include this and are broader than this, so the question is whether or not this potentially draws attention to why they were specifically iterated and not others.