Every single company that meets this test would automatically be considered to sufficiently, on national security grounds, require further analysis and further assessment as to whether or not they met the next test. As I said, right now the decision tree has the information determining the test, which is the following: Is this a national concern? Could this be injurious to national security? Would this be injurious to national security?
It's the analysis of the security agencies that right now prompts those shifts from section 25.1 to section 25.2 to section 25.3 in advice to the minister. This would essentially mandate an additional period and an additional analysis on the premise that it had already met that test.