I'm going to give an example. Everyone knows Walmart. Walmart Mexico was involved in a bribery scam for permits for store openings. I guess it was a big scandal in Mexico.
It's a multinational company. It was never convicted. It reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission. It paid substantial fines.
It's an example of one company. There are tons of them. I'm not going to name all of them, but the point was they were not convicted. As a major company....
When we look at the review process of other allies, I've been comparing a lot in this committee CFIUS and the United Kingdom's Investment Security Unit. Both of them will include companies that were even alleged to be in a mandatory review in some part of their process. Walmart may be a bad example for that, because there are going to be other companies that we've talked about at length around a critical strategic list of industries.
If any of those companies, for instance, was not convicted or reached a settlement, the premise would be that it could not be involved with a mandatory review. There are lots of examples where we might need that to be included. It doesn't always mean....
Based on our conversations in the last little while, the review process is triggered only in certain circumstances right now. Fewer than 2% are reviewed. Is that correct?