They're investigative parties, but they're not being given an investigative role with this amendment. As I understand it, under the amendment, the members of NSICOP are not privy to the details as to why an investment decision was taken. The committee members, if they are involved, should be involved.
When I look at it, it just says the identity of the non-Canadian subject to review, the terms of the investment and whether an investment decision's been taken, but it doesn't talk about the details of the “why” or the “why not” for that investment decision.
Am I missing something here? It looks to me like all they're being informed of is that there's been an investigation. They're not playing any real role in it, other than just saying it's an investigation. I don't see the purpose of it.