We went through this dance before with regard to it. There actually was kind of an agreement with the Liberals to do it, so it's pretty shocking to start this way because that was actually the understanding. We went through a lot of talk and testimony, and what we heard in terms of the response was kind of the “false straw man” argument about somebody reading legislatively through this. It actually isn't based upon any real substance or anything other than just an impression that it may or may not happen. It's the bogeyman argument we've been getting.
I'm not going to revisit all that, but I just have to say I'm pretty disappointed because we had actually reached a common agreement on this and apparently that's been torn up.