Mr. Chair, I thank the member for his question.
I think our assessment, having read through the amendment, is that this could very much be reviewed and understood to be differential treatment in that it does favour and provide differential treatment to some people with whom we have trade agreements and not to others with whom we have trade agreements. It would likely be contemplated as being offside of the most favoured nation clauses that are in the vast majority of our trade agreements.
With respect to its utility, I think we already do ensure that national security reviews are important and considered in all cases, but in cases for which there is no clear raising of questions related to national security, they should not be an encumbrance to the investment climate in Canada.