Yes.
Our concern prior to the summer recess was that such a clause, by giving—to use a colloquial term—a shout-out to privacy and intellectual property, might suggest that intellectual property and privacy aren't currently factors under consideration of the net benefit review, when very much, in our understanding and in our reading, they are. In many ways, I think our goal would be to see a subamendment that would assure those reading this that the imposition or the introduction of these two factors isn't at the expense of the consideration, that they were already there as factors for consideration under the net benefit review.