Once the word “assets” is in one of these amendments, including substantial assets, it would allow for guidance to be able to issue as to what that means. The problem with any asset is that, if I sell a photocopier and I run a laser business, I potentially am now encumbered by the act because I'm actually selling an asset, and the asset may or may not be substantive to the operations of the business.
There are both resource implications in terms of the number of company and asset transactions that are suddenly within our purview of review, and then also the degree to which we have the capacity to be able to actually issue guidance. The rationale for this determination is for us to be able to issue guidance to ensure that what we're getting at is actually meaningful.