I don't know about this, but thank you, MP Turnbull, for the clarification.
This is the part where I'm not sure if it's in order. I know that another amendment is coming in the same area, and just in the consideration of whether it should be this one or the next one, my non-lawyer reading of it is that the coming amendment is actually a narrowing of this, because it's saying that it has to be the significant assets of a corporation, not just assets but “substantially all of the assets”. This is very different from the one we have.
To me, based on what Mr. Schaan said, it actually would be a narrowing over what exists in the act, but I'm not a lawyer.