I'm hearing pretty strong sentiments from others that we're perhaps not going to get to a vote today, so perhaps we want to talk about this in subcommittee. I'm uncomfortable with this without considering it in more detail. We need to think about how this could prejudice other deals and relationships in the future. We need to consider some of the aspects of how it's worded. With respect to the “no speaking restrictions” part, I think what we're saying is that something we've reviewed in camera as part of our parliamentary privilege would be made public. I think we need to consider—very strongly consider—what the ramifications or unintended consequences of that might be.
I feel as though we may be able to achieve a path forward on this, but I think we need a little bit more time. If members would agree to defer this to the subcommittee, I think we could talk it through in a reasonable manner and hopefully find a path forward.