To my knowledge, unlike certain laws that provide for review every five years, there is no such specific provision in this bill, since it provides a flexible framework based on principles and is not prescriptive. That is also true of the current privacy act, which has been in effect for 20 years. That is why we are establishing this framework, and that is why the bill specifies which systems are high-impact. Since people said it was too vague, we added those details.
This framework will survive over time and we can see why that is necessary. Given the rapid pace of technological change, a framework is really what is needed. People in Europe, the United States and Japan are watching what we are doing. At the G7 meeting, Canada and France created the global partnership on AI. So people are very interested in what is happening in Canada, in France and in Europe, to get an overview of the issue and to see where the world is headed with respect to the regulation of artificial intelligence.