I'm trying to answer.
I disagree with you. I think the legitimate interest is necessary in some cases. I gave you an example, which is very clear.
I'm saying that we have a lot of work framed around that, and if anyone were to abuse that or take measures that would go against the intent of the bill, they'd be subject to criminal penalties. This is very serious business.
The fundamental right that we say we recognize is the privacy of Canadians. This is a very limited exception. This is very limited in its scope, and it's going to be supervised by the Privacy Commissioner.
I'd be happy to hear from you, sir, if you have any other ways you would suggest that we address that. The intention is to protect the consumers, but at the same time to allow legitimate business to happen. There are a number of examples people gave us in testimony. If you want to buy a watch and you want to measure your pulse, you're not going to consent every time you measure it.
There are a number of things we need to allow for businesses to function and for small and medium-sized businesses to be able to operate. However, at the same time, I can assure you that my resolve and the resolve of this team are that there would be significant guardrails around that and that we would protect the interests of Canadians.