We understand that the balance needs to be there.
You've talked about $20 million more for the Privacy Commissioner. We're going to be debating a tribunal and the use of a tribunal. There are different speeds at the tribunal that have worked and haven't worked for the Competition Bureau, so we'll certainly be looking at that and what's going to work for this instance.
One thing that came out last week from the Rogers-Shaw tribunal was that the tribunal itself actually had to pay $13 million to Rogers. From that, we're learning that perhaps the process needs to be improved even on the competition side, not just the privacy side.
As the minister right now making amendments or recommendations, you talked about giving $20 million. In this case, if that had been the privacy tribunal, they would have already lost it. What changes would you make as minister or would you recommend in amendments to this tribunal process, or to the Privacy Commissioner role itself, to ensure that we wouldn't have that happen at all when it came to this process, if we were to enact a tribunal?