Would it have shortened the time frame for the break-even analysis?
I think the key here is that you made a set of assumptions that were quite a bit narrower than what the government's analysis was. I think it's pretty clear to me that our assumption is that, if you make anchor investments in one node, it's going to attract investments in other nodes of the supply chain, which I think is quite reasonable, whereas you've essentially excluded all of the other investments and production-related revenues that would come in from those other nodes.
If you then opened your analysis up and did a model that included that 91.4% of the value chain, would it not have shortened the time frame for the break-even...?